Site Map | Reasons | Factors | Problems | Cooperation | Policies | Culture | Consulting | Investment | APEC Survey

Overview

Investment in knowledge

The role of business in R&D is increasing

Global trade and financing

Global integration of economic activity

Internationalization of industrial R&D

The amount and quality of R&D conducted in a country remain essential components of national innovation strategies. The domestic R&D by itself is no longer sufficient because of increased resources and the capabilities of numerous regions and nations to contribute to the global knowledge base. In 1950, the United States contributed nearly forty percent of the developed world's GDP and carried out twice as much R&D as the rest of the world. Half a century later, wealth and knowledge are created and distributed more widely around the globe. USA accounts for around 30% of world GDP and carries out 40% of global R&D.

In many APEC economies, R&D activities are less internationalised than production, but this is changing as more and more multinationals set up offshore R&D laboratories. Evaluating the net effect of R&D performed by foreign affiliates is a complex process. Ideally, the presence of research-performing foreign affiliates enables the host country to benefit from their technological and organisational capabilities. However, the available data indicate that R&D activities abroad consist primarily of design and development to help the parent company establish a market presence in the host country.

The share of foreign affiliates in industrial R&D varies widely across economies. The differences primarily reflect the contribution of foreign affiliates to industrial activity. The share of foreign affiliates also reflects the size of their R&D effort relative to that of domestic firms.

Other factors, such as the quality of scientific personnel and research centres and the scale of technology transfers from parent companies to affiliates abroad in relation to the independent R&D activity of those affiliates, may also play a part.

Diffusion of ICT

Technology levels and trade

Innovation Policies

In the interconnected, yet decentralized global economy, the long-term cost associated with not investing sufficiently in technology, innovation and people is high. While it might have been possible in the past to treat technology as a factor of production to be bought and sold, the technology-based, innovation infrastructure that will be required for economic success in the 21st century is harder to incubate.

The key word for S&T policies in the Year 2000 is innovation. Innovation is viewed as much more than R&D investment or the ability to apply technology to make new and better products. It is seen as a process driven by:

Speed

The ability to bring high-tech products to market quickly is a critical factor that many countries' S&T policies and programs address in a wide variety of ways. Policies initiate cooperation among academics, public researchers and companies to ease the transfer of technology and knowledge, and makes public research more commercially relevant. Innovation relies on a partnership between the public and private sectors in which the government invests in long-range S&T and in mechanisms to promote private sector investment and risk-taking. Because it is closer to the market and "speed" counts, the private sector, working in partnership with the government and university community, is generally perceived as the most appropriate lead partner in determining future technology directions. Governments are nurturing the creation of technology-based SMEs through venture capital funds, fiscal incentives to undertake R&D and hire researchers, and other measures.

Basic Research

Japan, Korea and other nations believe innovation requires them to create knowledge through their own basic science research rather than applying technology created elsewhere. For smaller countries like Thailand and New Zealand, it means joint public/private sector foresight exercises to prioritize the basic research areas in which their capabilities and resources can be expended most productively.

Industrial basic research is relatively more developed in Korea and Japan where around one-third of basic research is performed by the business enterprise sector. This could mainly be due to the large share of R&D performed by the business sector, approximately 70% of overall R&D.

Life Sciences

Compared to ICT, internationally comparable data on biotechnology R&D are extremely limited, so that it is difficult to measure its extent. Another indicator often used as a proxy to measure health-related R&D is R&D expenditure by the pharmaceutical industry.

Conclusion

Internationalisation, especially in the fields of science and technology, can or cannot take place due to various reasons or factors. Different economies provide varied strengths to encourage foreign investments while their weaknesses deters any outide participation. Japan focuses on electronics, the US is the center for new technology, Indonesia, Hong Kong and other EPZs are known for their manual labour capabilities. Specialists from all over the world go to particular countries due to the opportunities in a certain field available there. Niche strengths of some of the economies are listed below:

This section discusses the reasons, factors, cultural issues, policy issues and other issues which encourage/discourage globalisation.